I like when people realize their financial limitations and look for ways to cut their spending and live within their means. And now the governor of CA is being forced to look for solutions of his own to his state’s disastrous financial situation (they’re expected to run out of money in about 2 months), and he’s looking for ways to cut back government spending. (I often have wondered if govermental spending has any limitations, so it’s nice to see that there is a point when even government officials recognize they can’t keep on spending – too bad things have to be extremely desperate before cuts are considered.) One of the things he’s planning is to cut out conventional textbooks. What does he plan to use instead? Online textbooks.
I commend the government officials for trying to find solutions out of their dilemma. This would be a big savings, and it was also pointed out that it will be better physically for the students since they don’t have to shlep around all those heavy books.
As far as the value of the texts themselves, in my opinion, getting rid of most textbooks isn’t much of a loss. I’d be hard pressed to think of less effective ways to learn than from standardized textbooks, unless it’s to listen to a teacher droning on and telling the students the exact information they could read for themselves in their textbooks. But replacing them with online versions of the same dreary works isn’t going to improve student learning or retention. Though I love to read, I see online reading as a necessary evil (I’m sure my kids would be surprised by this, since I do so much of it); it takes more time and I don’t think it’s healthy to spend a lot of time in front of the computer. And while the kids wouldn’t have the physical strain on their shoulders from lugging around a heavy knapsack, they’d have eye strain to consider.
In our homeschooling, I try to avoid textbooks as much as possible. Textbooks are designed to be politically correct above all else (and as such are a venue to promote values that I don’t share), and just as bad, their accuracy of the facts is often questionable (this isn’t a matter of opinion – do some research if you want to learn more).
Some companies have tried to eliminate the political aspect by choosing selections that are more neutral. When my ds was in ninth grade last year, I had the opportunity to review his English textbook – it was a kosher version of regular literature texts (Mesorah publishes them under another company name). They use selections of classic works and stories that don’t have the less desirable elements of typical literature selections. I thought it was a nice idea, and then I read through a good part of the textbook. Gosh, it was dull – and I have a high comprehension level and love to read! It didn’t suprise me when my son fell asleep repeatedly when reading the stories that were assigned. In their efforts to take out anything objectionable, they weren’t left with much of interest. I commented on this to the English teacher at parent conferences, and it was clear that though she didn’t want to say so outright, she agreed with me.
In place of textbooks, I prefer what Charlotte Mason termed living books – books that are engaging, written by people who care about their subject matter – not committees. And of course, hands on learning opportunities can’t be beat for integration and assimilation of material.
As far as CA and the choice they’ve made, while they won’t improve students’ learning, at least they’ll be saving money!
Avivah
Leave a Reply