Several weeks I was at a social event, where I saw someone who recently made a wedding for her oldest child. I had heard via my husband via her husband that they had kept it small, so I took the opportunity to ask what having a small wedding entailed. (Hearing from people who have made simple and truly affordable weddings about how they did it is very interesting to me.)
She told me that they only invited 120 people, which I thought was impressive since it’s not easy to whittle down a guest list to that amount. But then she added, “And the other side had 300 guests”, which shifted my perception of the wedding somewhat – 420 guests for a formal dinner didn’t seem very small to me!
A couple of the other women there who were listening to this exchange were quick to fill me in, apparently thinking how obviously clueless I was to what was normal and appropriate. They told me that a small wedding is 300 – 400 people for the meal, and one told me her cousin recently had 2500 guests! (I had to ask how much that wedding cost – 4 million shekels, she said. But at least it was a wealthy family that could afford it.)
I shared my concern that lavish weddings have become the norm in the Orthodox world, so much that we don’t even see the lavishness of the standard wedding as unusual. We’ve lost a communal sense of what simplicity looks like when it comes to a wedding, and we also seem to be communally oblivious to the fat that paying for these fancy weddings is way above the means of the average family.
I thought that was a reasonable thing to say, but don’t worry, there were people there to once again set me straight. “What do you mean? Just the extended family from one side will be 200 people!” I suggested, maybe we need to consider inviting people according to the budget we have to work with, and that might mean reconsidering if every single family member has to be invited to the wedding meal. Maybe if it were normal to just invite the immediate nuclear family, rather than every cousin, aunt, uncle, and person who married in somewhere along the line, then it wouldn’t be considered so unthinkable to not invite all these people. Shouldn’t we be thinking about how to make a wedding within our actual ability to pay for it?
One woman shrugged and said, “So what, so you borrow the money and pay back 1000 shekels every month for two years.” With a family of ten children, that would mean spending twenty years of life with our extra income paying for ten evenings that last a total of 40 – 50 hours. To me that seems wildly disproportionate – the life energy that goes into earning that kind of money is significant. I was feeling such a total disconnect between what I was saying and the responses I was hearing.
Then I realized that I’m looking at the wedding situation as something that I’ll need to deal with in the foreseeable future, as the parent paying the bill, while they (as parents of much younger children) were looking at it as someone who had the bill paid for them. It’s pretty easy to justify spending someone else’s money. But then again, when I speak with people closer to my age group, there seems to be a fatalist attitude that this is the reality, and there’s nothing you can do.
I have to tell you, the entire discussion left me very discouraged. I really thought that a good percentage of people intellectually were able to see the unsustainability of expecting parents of average means to make lavish formal weddings. I understand the difficulty in keeping things simple when there are two different families who need to come to an agreement about this, who may have very different ideas about what kind of wedding their children will have. When you’re making a bris, bar mitzva, kiddush, etc, you’re the sole arbiter of how much you spend on these family milestones. For us, all of these events have been celebrated with much joy but always spending within our means. I realize that I can’t assume it will always be like this. But I thought there were many others who at least wished they could stay within their means. Now I’m no longer so sure about that.
This conversation came shortly after a talk with a friend whose oldest child just got engaged. She was sharing with me the pressure they’re feeling to buy the groom the mandatory gifts, particularly since the other side is financially much more comfortable and has already sent their daughter jewelry that they are trembling about how to reciprocate for. They’ve been working hard for the past few years to get out of credit card debt and live within their actual financial means (using lots of money saving tips I’ve shared here on my blog), and facing the expenses of a wedding (and pre-wedding) are very daunting.
If you don’t know about the insanity of the standards for the mandatory gifts that need to be given to the bride and groom prior to and at the wedding, I don’t think I should enlighten you. You’re just better off not knowing. Because it’s disturbing. Really disturbing. Sometimes I wonder if the central point of getting married is getting somewhat lost in all the materialistic expectation around an engagement/marriage – I thought when I got engaged to my husband that he was the treasure (and the years have shown I was more right than I could have guessed).
When I got home later that evening, I was reflecting on the conversation with these women, and had a sudden realization about a big contributing factor for the disparity in our views. I’ve written loads here about different things I’ve done to live within our means; it’s not a secret that I feel strongly that being responsible means living with what we have and not what I wished we had!
To me, debt is something to avoid and with the exception of a mortgage, have managed to live with the money we actually have our entire married life. Sometimes people make assumptions about the amount of money we must have been making to do this (way over our actual income); I think people would rather think we were really lucky rather than recognize we consistently were willing to make hard choices. Living within our means hasn’t always easy – sometimes we did without, sometimes we had to wait a while until we saved up the money for it. We’ve had to be very clear with ourselves about the difference between wants and needs, though we’ve often marveled at how many of our wants have been provided for.
It occurred to me that if you see debt as a normal tool for everyday living, my position really does seem ridiculous. Why should you deny yourself something as nice as everyone else, if you can borrow the money and pay it back later? If you’ve spent your life living this way when it comes to groceries and clothes, then a wedding is just the next logical step. If debt is normal, then it shifts your entire view of spending.
So what’s the answer to this issue? It’s a lot bigger than me, that’s for sure! And I don’t know what I’ll do when faced with this decision – there’s tremendous social pressures on everyone when making a wedding. I think we live in a world where so many of our decisions are made because we’re worried about what others think of us. If we were able to put that aside and be honest about who we are and what our resources were, instead of pretending to have what we don’t have to impress people who don’t really care that much about us, then the idea of making a simple wedding wouldn’t be such a hard sell.
Did you have a simple wedding? In what ways were you able to cut costs? Do you think that spending less compromised the overall enjoyment you had at your wedding or not?
Avivah