Today I received the following email from my synagogue regarding what is being portrayed by the city health department as a public health warning. You can see the response I sent to the synagogue at the end as well as additional comments.
“We want to share some important information with you regarding a continuing mumps outbreak in this part of the country.
The situation has involved over 1200 people, primarily members of the Hasidic community in New York and New Jersey. While this health alert targets the Hasidic community, we are aware that the Yeshiva community has been affected as well.
There have been no outbreaks in the Hasidic community in Baltimore City . However, with Passover fast approaching and with it the opportunity for extensive social interaction with people from the affected areas of New York and New Jersey , the Health Department aims to make the community aware of the issue and to encourage everyone, especially children, to be sure they are fully immunized against mumps. This is achieved by receiving 2 doses of MMR vaccine, at least 4 weeks apart. Typically, one dose is given at 12 months and the second at 4-6 years, prior to school entry. However, the doses can be administered at a later age. The other way to be protected, of course, is to have had the disease, as confirmed by a physician.
We are asking your assistance in communicating this information in an appropriate manner to your family and friends. You can cite the facts that are presented in the attached document. The Health Department has already sent out information to the pediatricians and federally qualified health centers in the area.
Please keep in mind that this is a time-sensitive issue. Passover is coming; the first night is March 29. With families joining together for the holiday, that will create optimum opportunity for mingling and infection.
The vaccination requires 10-14 days to produce protection. So it is imperative that you make your family and friends aware of this so they can ensure their protection in time for the holiday.”
Things like this disturb me because they are: 1) based on inaccurate information; 2) creating fear and hysteria; 3) don’t have any helpful information to balance the message being sent. Here’s the message I sent in response:
“I’m disappointed to receive a message like this from the shul. Those who are familiar with the mumps outbreak know that in fact the majority of those who contracted it were fully vaccinated on schedule, and therefore the recommendation to take care of vaccinations is unhelpful. I realize the purpose of this message was to be helpful but I’ve watched a lot of hysteria in the frum community online build for at least a couple of months now based on inaccurate information like this. People are frantic since their vaccinated children are getting mumps and the only information they have is that the vaccination should have prevented it.
Mumps is a minor and unpleasant childhood illness that is easily dealt with with mega doses of vitamin C in the event that someone does contract it; let’s not get people worked up about something like this, particularly at a time of year when so many people are already stressed out and won’t have the time to get accurate information. “
I realize whoever sent it out was basically cutting and pasting the information from the city health department, seeing it as a service to the community. I don’t see this as a negative reflection of the synagogue employee or volunteer who sent this, clearly trying to be helpful. But I do see statements like these: “With families joining together for the holiday, that will create optimum opportunity for mingling and infection” as inspiring fear.
I also think that since young children are the least affected by mumps, the suggestion to be sure that especially children get the vaccination makes no sense. It’s not the kids who have to worry about long term side affects; it’s post adolescent boys and men (I’ll put this concern into perspective below).
I was on a discussion board a couple of months ago when a woman shared that her daughter overseas had a roommate who contracted the mumps. I couldn’t believe the extremely emotionalized and dramatic reaction of the mother – threatening to sue the school (as if the school has the power to keep germs from circulating in the air :roll:) since they must have allowed a student who wasn’t fully vaccinated in, saying that those who don’t vaccinate are responsible for spreading disease, and on and on and on.
When other posters jumped on board to agree with her and blame all those horrible and selfish natural- granola- crunchy-negligent parents who don’t care about anyone and leave a trail of disease and suffering in their wake, I felt it relevant to share just one tiny little detail that was leaving the medical establishment in Israel (where this happened) scratching its head – most of those who got the mumps were fully vaccinated (as I mentioned in my note to the synagogue). An investigation was launched there to figure out what happened – since clearly the issue was the lack of effectiveness of the vaccine.
Does anyone else wonder why a critical point like this is conveniently being omitted? Maybe because noting it would create a conflict between what you’re being told to do and what will actually be of benefit. There’s nothing being suggested to protect oneself from the mumps except vaccination – and what can they tell you to do when you’ve already followed their suggestions and it hasn’t helped?!
Fear of the unknown is hard to deal with and it’s understandable that people overreact when faced with something they hardly know anything about. Here’s a little bit of information to dispel the fear. The mumps for many generations was a common childhood illness – uncomfortable but rarely dangerous. Lifetime immunity was a nice side benefit for those who had the mumps. Some of you might be as old as me, lol, and remember when chickenpox was considered in this way.
Is someone reading and thinking, “doesn’t she know about the sterility issue? You can’t take a chance with that, can you?” Isn’t it a wonder that humankind has somehow perpetuated itself despite the majority of males for hundreds of years having the mumps? Hmm.
The reality is that only about two percent of males who get mumps after puberty have testicular swelling. Of that very small percentage of post adolescent boys, 98% have swelling on only one side. Now, of that very, very small percentage that have swelling of both testicles, the huge majority recover and have no issues affecting sterility. So you don’t have to be a professor of mathematics to realize that statistically this is unlikely to be a problem.
And you already know I’m of the belief that building up a strong immune system is your best defense for any kind of sickness (along with lots of vitamin C and rest). I wrote about guidelines for taking vitamin C here. A positive outlook can do wonders, too! I won’t be worrying about this one tiny bit, and I hope none of you will, either!
Avivah